Aliyah Blog
Moving UP in the World

What is your Perspective? »
« In-Flight Zmanim

Perspectives and Priorities

A number of years ago while I was still in school, I attended a shiur given on Messila Yesharim, given by a Rabbi who traveled more than an hour each way once a week. Sometime in the middle of the year, the men in the shiur were invited to spend a Shabbat with him and his family in Lakewood (women were invited for a different Shabbat). On Friday night at the Shabbat table, I posed the following question (not a direct quote – my memory is not that good):

“Why is it that so much of the American Chareidi world is seemingly indifferent about aliyah and Eretz Yisrael. It doesn’t seem like something that is seen as having such a high priority for many in the Yeshiva world – this is despite that fact that nearly all Rishonim say that it is a Torah commandment to live in Eretz Yisrael.” This seemed like an appropriate thing to ask in the conversation, since we had just been talking about how one of his children had gone to kollel in Yerushalayim (if I remember correctly) and had decided to come back to America.”

(By the way, did you know that the branch of the Lakewood Yeshiva located in Yerushalayim is called “Lakewood East”? Such chutzpah! I would not be surprised if to do so would be transgressing the negative prohibition of speaking disparagingly of the Land of Israel and its Jewish inhabitants – the sin of the spies. But I digress…)

The response that I received:

“Yes, it is important to live in Israel. But it is so hard. Young people try to go there, but it is hard for them to be away from their families in America.”

Ok, I have heard explanations before along these lines. I can totally understand how it can be very hard for people to make aliyah. I was a bit surprised to here such a blasé response to my query after having heard this Rabbi speak so fervently about Shmirat haMitzvot and Avodat Hashem, but fine, I can accept it. The next part of the conversation is the part that got to me.

After talking about the Rabbis family and grandchildren, he started talking about how there are so many large families in Lakewood (ie: 5-10 children). He spoke about how it was such a great mitzvah to bring Jewish children into the world and he knew so many people who were so commited to raising large frum families.

I observed: “I agree that it is a really tremendous mitzvah that these people are doing. But don’t you think that after having a certain number of children, if a family is living in poverty and cannot afford to support the needs of more children, that they should stop having children. Or maybe after a certain number of children, the parents can no longer mentally cope with the burden of more children. Should”

Reply: “Absolutely not! It is a great mitzvah to have children. If a person finds themself in a bad financial situation, why should this decision affect whether or not to have more children. Hakodosh Baruch Hu will provide – you need to have bitachon (faith) that the support will come. I have seen so many situations where a family decided to have more children when they may not have been able to afford it – and then after they had the child, the money came from somewhere”.

Me: “But aren’t we taught ‘Ein Somchin al haNeis‘ (one should not assume that a miracle will occur)? The fact that you know of stories where financial support appeared after a couple had more children does not mean that we can assume this will always come. And anyway, after a man has a son and a daughter, there is no more mitzvah from the Torah to have children. True, there is a rabbinical mitzvah to have more children, but if a person has already fulfilled the Torah commandment of Peru uRevu and can not longer afford to have more children, how can they then go and have more children that they absolutely cannot afford to maintain and who will be living in poverty.

Reply: “It is still not a reason not to have more children. We need to have bitachon that Hashem will provide”. Etc, etc, etc.

The thing that I still remember about this experience is how on one issue (having children after one has fulfilled the Torah commandment and there are other mitigating factors like money or mental health), all I heard was: it is a great mitzvah, we need to have bitachon. When it comes to the Torah commandment of settling in the Land of Israel, it was excuses. This attitude was kind of scary to me – after all, the Rabbi who expressed it to me was (and is, and with God’s help will be for many years) a wonderful scholar, teacher, mentor, father, grandfather, etc who is able to command the respect of anyone he encounters. Yet, when it came to leaving “home” in order to go Home, it was not even something to be considered, something to be regretful over. It was excuses. If the people in the diaspora to whom we are looking to lead out communities are not able to realize the importance of the Land of Israel today to the Jewish people, what will it be tomorrow (or in 5 years)?

This entry was posted on May 25th, 2005 at 13:06 by Yaakov and is filed under Aliyah, Experiences. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Perspectives and Priorities”

Lou Rutker Says:
June 26th, 2005 at 22:18

Do you have the same issue with the names of the following yeshivos? Mir, Slabodka, Ponevezh, Lomzah and others in Isael? It might interest you to know that the name of Lakewood East is not and wasn’t the formal name but a poorly named nick name.

Yaakov Says:
June 26th, 2005 at 22:47

I don’t have any issue with the fact that their is a branch of the Lakewood yeshiva in Yerushalayim. It is wonderful. The amount of Torah that is being learned right now in Yerushalayim and in Eretz Yisrael has never been equaled.

Re: Mir, Slabodka, Ponevezh, etc – these were all yeshivot that existed in Europe before the war. They were destroyed. When it was possible, new yeshivot were started in Eretz Yisrael bearing the names of these old institutions. They are names – like all institutions have names, not making any value statement regarding their current location.

Unlike Mir and Slabodka, the Lakewood yeshiva is currently operating in the city of Lakewood. It is wonderful that they recognize that sending students to learn in the Holy Land is an endeavour worth pursuing. However, poorly chosen nickname or not, the Jerusalem branch of the Lakewood yeshiva is commonly known as “Lakewood East”. I have never heard it referred to otherwise.

When I hear this name, it is telling me more than the fact that the institution has its financial base in America. Someone who calls a place in Jerusalem “Lakewood East” is saying that the value of this place in Jerusalem is only recognizable in relation to some place in Chutz La’aretz. Lakewood is the home. Jerusalem, being east of Lakewood is therefore properly called “Lakewood East”.

You might say that I am taking this too seriously, that I am reading too much into a nickname, etc. Maybe. But take it one step further (btw, I am not saying that people who call it “Lakewood East” intend this. I think that for the most part it is just a nickname that caught on. I am examining the sentiments of Jews in chutz la’aretz that may have led to such a nickname being created and catching on). If Jerusalem is Lakewood East, then Lakewood is really the center. Take the word “Lakewood” in the previous sentence and substitute “Berlin”, “Warsaw” or “Worms” (or “Brooklyn” or “the Five Towns”). It is a theme in Jewish history that things get to be so nice in exile that the Jews start to say “Jerusalem? who needs Jerusalem. Keep it for youselves. (Berlin | Warsaw | Worms | etc) is my Jerusalem”. Whenever those words have been spoken, crusages, pogroms and holocaust follow soon after.

I am not saying that things like this will definitely be happening in the medinah shel chessed (nation of charity – ie: America) any time soon. I am saying that to refer to the land of Israel in any way that implies a secondary status is is on the same level as reenacting the sin of the spies that we read last Shabbat. Eretz Yisrael is the heart. The rest of the world may play important secondary roles, but the heart is what really matters.

david grant (London) Says:
February 26th, 2006 at 0:29

I think that you might like this one.

Rabbi Avigdor Miller zt”l, Shabbos Droshos 14 Tayves 5756 Vayechi:

“Flatbush, Borough Park, Williamsburg, Crown Heights, Brooklyn is the place to be, and though others argue with me, I see no advantage in sending your children to Israel. Let them get married and stay in America. Why must parents spend thousands of dollars to be able to see their grandchildren and children? There is no nachas from an overseas postcard or from photographs. Stay here in Brooklyn so your parents can see you. As it says in the verse, “Then Yaakov said to Yosef, “Now I can rest in peace, now that I have seen your face…”(Bereishis 46:30). Wait for Moshiach to come then it will be all right to go to Eretz Yisrael…..Therefore I say, make a bris with your son-in-law-to-be, that he will promise to keep the family in America.

Yaakov Says:
February 26th, 2006 at 8:27

Thanks for the reference. I am sure that Rav Miller had his reasons for saying what he did, and I do not have access to that context, so I will not reply to the question that he was answering.

I will however respond to the content. And it is not me who is responding. Rav Miller himself says “and though others argue with me”…

It seems that this answer is being given to someone who is asking about whether or not there is an advantage to sending one’s children to Israel when one does not intend to move there. I do not think that this is the proper question. It is not up to a parent to send his children to Israel. The mitzva is incumbent on each an every individual person. Just as a parent cannot put on tefillin to fulfill his son’s obligation, so too, the mitzva of settling the Land of Israel (a biblical obligation which applies in both the pre and post-messianic eras) can only be fulfilled by the person doing it.

If one is leaving all of one’s close family in chutz l’aretz this is a factor that one must take into one’s plans. But I personally find the answer that “there is no nachas from an overseas postcard” as a reason for not fulfilling many mitzvot that can only be fulfilled in the Land of Israel to be just a little bit shvach (weak).

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Your email address will not be shared with anyone nor will it be displayed on screen.


  • Subscribe

    • Posts
    • Comments
    • Newsvine
    • Israel Photos
    • Contact
  • Popular Posts (Last 7 Days)

  • Popular Posts (All Time)

    1. Aliyah Blog
    2. Kosher Toilet Paper
    3. Learning Hebrew Slang
    4. Yad Binyamin
    5. Who are the Palestinians
    6. In-Flight Zmanim
    7. Receiving a US-based Salary in Israel the Right Way
  • Recent Posts

    • Regifting Fail
    • Israel's Right in the 'Disputed' Territories
    • Open Up My Money Please
    • Google Maps Removes Israel
    • North American Olim Huge Boost to Israeli Economy
    • New Israeli Technology to Fix Leaky Water Pipes
    • Why the Israeli Economy is Thriving while the Rest of the World is in Recession
    • Shana Tovah
    • White Out Israel
    • Israel's Arab Cheerleaders and a Hostile White House
  • Archives

    • March 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • June 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
  • Categories

    • Commentary (257)
      • Aliyah (68)
      • History (21)
      • Israel (72)
      • Misc (45)
      • News (24)
      • Op-Ed (48)
      • Political (49)
      • Stories (8)
      • Torah (29)
    • Log (151)
      • Advice (10)
      • Communities (12)
      • Experiences (67)
      • Jobs (11)
      • Misc (26)
      • Observations (17)
      • Only in EY (41)
    • Announcements (10)
    • Misc Stuff (11)
  • Links

    • Advice/Support

      • Kumah
      • Nefesh B’Nefesh
      • Tehilla
      • The Jewish Agency
    • Blogs

      • Chopping Wood
      • EllisWeb
      • Hirhurim – Musings
      • Israel Matzav
      • JoeSettler
      • Life in Israel
      • OlehGirl
      • Point of Pinchas
      • Shteig Shtark
      • The Kosher Blog
      • The Muqata
      • Treppenwitz
      • Tzipiyah
      • WestBankBlog
      • yaakov.newsvine.com
    • Employment

      • Computer Jobs in Israel
    • General

      • Aishdas
      • Israel Photos
      • Jacob Richman’s Aliyah Pages
      • JRants
      • Map of Yerushalayim
      • Yad Binyamin
    • News/Politics

      • IMRA – Middle East News and Analysis
      • Jewish World Review
      • Steven Plaut
  • New from the Vine


RSS: Entries | Comments